Wednesday, June 23, 2010

Please feel free to comment on your thoughts from this article in the 1970's. Ideas you agree with or disagree...


YOU MEAN A RABBIT CAN BE TAUGHT TO FLY?
As an individual you must not be satisfied with just becoming like everybody else.
By Leo Buscaglia, Ph.D.





Busscaglia: "I teach seminars in graduate school. It's amazing how people have learned to parrot by then."
A rabbit, bird, fish, squirrel, duck and so on, all decided to start a school. The rabbit insisted that running had to be in the curriculum. The bird insisted that flying be in the curriculum. The fish insisted that swimming be in the curriculum. The squirrel insisted that perpendicular trees climbing be in the curriculum.
All the other animals wanted their specialty to be in the curriculum, too, so they put everything in and then made the glorious mistake of insisting that all the animals take all of the courses. The rabbit was magnificent in running; nobody could run like the rabbit. But they insisted that it was good intellectual and emotional discipline to teach the rabbit flying. So they insisted that the rabbit learned to fly and they put her on this branch and said, "Fly, rabbit!" And the poor old thing jumped off, broke her leg and fractured her skull. She became brain-damaged and then she couldn't run very well, either.
The same way with the bird -- she could fly like a freak all over the place, do loops and loops, and she was making an A. But they insisted that this bird burrow holes in the ground like a gopher. Of course she broke her wings and everything else, and then she couldn't fly.
We know this is wrong, yet nobody does anything about it. You may be a genius. You may be one of the greatest writers in the world, but you can't get into a university unless you can pass trigonometry. For what? Look at the list of drop outs: William Faulkner, John F. Kennedy, Thomas Edison. They couldn't face school. "I don't want to learn perpendicular tree climbing. I'm never going to climb perpendicularly. I'm a bird. I can fly to the top of the tree without having to do that."
"Never mind, it's good discipline."
As an individual, you must not be satisfied with just becoming like everybody else. You must think for yourself. For example, art supervisors. I can remember when they used to come to my classroom in elementary school, and I'm sure you can remember it, too. You were given a paper, and the teacher would put up the drawing in front of you and you were really excited. It was going to be art time. You had all the crayolas in front of you, and you folded your hands and you waited. And soon the art teacher would come running in, because she had been to fourteen other classrooms that day teaching art. She ran in, and she'd huff and puff and she'd say, "Good morning girls and boys. Today we are going to draw a tree." And all the kids would say, "Goody, we're going to draw a tree!" And then she'd get up there with a green crayola and she'd draw this great big green thing. And then she put a brown base on it and a few blades of grass. And she'd say, "There is a tree." And all the kids would look at it and they'd say, "That isn't a tree. That's a lollipop." But she said that was a tree, and then she's pass out these papers and say, "Now, draw a tree." She didn't really say, "Draw a tree" -- she said, "Draw my tree." And the sooner you found out that's what she meant and could reproduce this lollipop and hand it to her, the sooner you would get an A.
But here was little Janie who knew that wasn't a tree, because she'd seen a tree such as this art teacher had never experienced! So she got magenta, and orange, and blue, and purple, and green, and she scribbled all over her page and happily brought it up and gave it to the teacher. She looked at it and said, "Oh my God...."
How long does it take somebody to realize that what they're really saying is, "To pass, I want you to reproduce my tree." And so it goes through the first grade, second, third and right on into seminars in graduate school. I teach seminars in graduate school. It's amazing how people have learned to parrot by then. Think? Don't be ridiculous. They can give you the facts, verbatim, just as you've given it to them. And you can't blame those students, because that's what they've been taught. You say to them, "Be creative," and they're fearful. And so what happens to our uniqueness; what happens to our tree? All this beautiful uniqueness has gone right down the drain. Everybody is like everybody else, and everybody is happy. R.D. Laing says, "we are satisfied when we've made people like ourselves out of our children.
Excerpted from the book, LIVING, LOVING & LEARNING by Leo Buscaglia

4 comments:

  1. I agree with that article! I always would dislike the classes in college where I just had to spit back what I had heard in the lecture to pass a test the week before. I felt not only was I really not learning anything; I was not being creative or challenged. I think as a special educator I am constantly focusing on my student's uniqueness and letting them be creative!

    ReplyDelete
  2. This is an old article, and sadly it is still relevant today. As a social studies teacher, this is a big problem for me. I teach a class called "world cultures", and the goal of it is "to help understand how the world works". I have a problem with that because I can only teach them how I think the world works...I am a smart man, but I have NO IDEA how the world really works!

    This article also stresses the need for more specialization....other edu systems around the world specialize a lot more than the US, and there are definite pros and cons....I think what we can get out of this is that we should be more concerned about exposing kids to different ways of thinking, and less concerned with their evaluation of that thinking.

    ReplyDelete
  3. A very interesting analogy, but very true. We try to stuff our kids full of all this general stuff that truly has no relevance to them at all. All of us have been the bird who had no interest in anything but flying, or the rabbit who only wanted to run. So why do we give them learning experiences that truly have no meaning to them? I understand that we want to give them a variety of learning experiences through late grade schools. My husband is a principal of a public International Baccalaureate (IB)school who has all of their children take the cores, PE, Technology, World Language, Art, and Music to develop the whole child. But when they reach high school, why can't we let our rabbit's run and birds fly? Why can't we create our curriculum and our high learning standards to fit student's needs? Don't we do this with our student's with IEP's? Why can't we do it for all? For example: I am a student who truly loves cars. Why can't a teacher and a student sit down and create an educational plan that fits that specific student. The teacher knows what kind of standards are needed in the all the areas, so why not develop a collaborative plan to meet both the school's and the student's goals? This requires us to have a very different outlook on what "school" is. This requires teachers to truly engage kids at their level and their interests, something that really doesn't happen for most of our student population (the rabbits and the birds...).

    ReplyDelete
  4. I hope the industrail days of "reproduction" are winding down. As we head into the 21st century we need innovative thinkers. How do we create innovative thinkers?

    ReplyDelete